James Martin, a progressive priest who advocates for LGBTQ Catholics, said on Twitter. “Of course it’s aimed at gay priests, and ‘gay apps,’ which shouldn’t surprise anyone,” Fr. Many critics protested that such a linking of gay sex with child abuse, with no evidence, revealed the homophobia at work in the efforts to expose the priest. The Tricky Calculations I’m Making About Omicron as a Health Care Worker The Gross Addition You Should Make to Your Rapid Testing Protocol The CDC’s Defense of Its New COVID Guidelines Is Complete Nonsense In the original Pillar piece, however, the journalists made it clear that their reasoning went beyond the hypocrisy of Burrill’s actions: “ny use of the app by the priest could be seen to present a conflict with his role in developing and overseeing national child protection policies, as Church leaders have called in recent months for a greater emphasis on technology accountability in Church policies.”

All of this is legal, the privacy engineer said, but not something most users factor into their risk-taking. But it would have included the timestamped GPS locations for the device from when the app was in use. “We have looked closely at this story, and the pieces simply do not add up. Grindr has policies and systems in place to protect personal data, and our users should continue to feel confident and proud in using Grindr regardless of their religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identity.”) The data would have been presented as “anonymized” through the removal of certain pieces of information, such as users’ names. Grindr said in a statement that the company did not believe it was the source of the data. This year, Norway fined Grindr $11.7 million for disclosing users’ private information to advertising companies, in violation of European privacy laws. (In 2018, Grindr, which uses highly granular location information, was found to have shared users’ anonymized locations, race, sexual preferences, and even HIV status with third-party analytic firms. Grindr itself would not have been the source of the data, but the ad network would have been given full access to the users’ information as long as they agreed to Grindr’s terms of services.

According to one privacy engineer who has worked on issues related to location data, Pillar (or the group that had offered CNA the data back in 2018) probably purchased a data set from a data broker, which in turn had likely purchased the data from a third-party ad network that Grindr uses.

Grindr customer service